Skip to main content.

Health Reform and Election 2012: Handicapping What Comes Next

Health Reform and Election 2012: Handicapping What Comes Next

Picture of Barbara Feder Ostrov

Now that we've all voted – right? – our attention is turning to how health reform and Medicare changes might be affected by the results of today's election.

First, be sure to sign up for our Thursday webinar on health reform and the election, when leading health journalists and policy experts will offer story ideas and new insights based on election results.

Here's more analysis on what might happen depending on outcome of Presidential and Senate races today:

With President Barack Obama ahead in the polls, healthcare blogger Maggie Mahar looks to the Senate races as a key factor determining the future of health reform, writing:

While all eyes focus on the presidential race, the ultimate fate of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) could depend on the Senate contests in the states…If Republicans take the (currently Democratic-controlled) Senate, the two chambers could pass legislation that would:

  • eliminate the premium subsidies designed to make health insurance affordable for middle-income and low-income families
  • bring an end to Medicaid expansion, and
  • rescind the individual mandate that everyone buy insurance or pay a tax.

Writing for Kaiser Health News, Jay Hancock points out that "an Obama win would immediately highlight the challenge of opening subsidized, online insurance marketplaces on time by 2014. Both the administration and most states are deemed to be behind schedule."

Also at Kaiser Health News, Julie Appleby handicaps what employers are likely to do post-election, noting (to employees' relief) that:

No matter who wins the presidential election, most workers who get health insurance through their jobs won't see a lot of immediate changes in their health benefits.

Employers will continue looking for ways to cap expenses, moving toward higher deductible policies, or placing limits on how much they pay toward their workers’ premiums -- both trends that predate the federal health law, analysts say.

And Ezra Klein of the Washington Post highlights how, counterintuitively, the Tea Party may have helped some Senate Democrats keep their seats and control of the Senate, and thus "protect Obamacare."

Photo credit: Ho John Lee via Flickr

Leave A Comment


Soaring out-of-pocket costs, rising premiums, and shaky insurance exchanges raise urgent questions this election season. What policies might address these problems, and how do the presidential candidates’ health plans differ? This webinar will give an overview of each candidates’ policy prescriptions and provide reporters with crucial context for covering one of the election’s most important but overlooked issues.

The 2017 California Fellowship, for California-based journalists only, will be held March 5-9, 2017 in Los Angeles. This Fellowship will focus on vulnerable populations and access to care and health care reform and innovation. We also take an in-depth look at how community conditions influence individuals' prospects for health. Each Fellow receives a $1,000 stipend to assist with the costs of reporting an ambitious Fellowship project on a California health issue, as well as six months of mentoring by a Senior Fellow. Deadline to apply is Dec. 1.  For more information, go here.


Member Activities

Bill Gordon joined the community

Connect with Bill Gordon

Anna Romano has shared a blog post

Read it.

Earl Reser's profile has been updated

Connect with Earl Reser

R. Jan Gurley has shared a blog post

Read it.

Ruth Rogers commented on a post

Join the conversation.
More Member Activities

Follow Us



CHJ Icon