Skip to main content.

Drug Company Consultants "Explain" Military Suicides---Kind Of

Drug Company Consultants "Explain" Military Suicides---Kind Of

Picture of Martha Rosenberg

It took academic, government and military researchers five years to say they don't really know what is causing military suicides but whatever it is--it isn't the psychoactive drugs they are prescribing and pushing. There have been more than 6,500 suicides since the Iraq and Afghanistan wars says Army Times---one every 80 minutes according to a 2012 Veterans Affairs report. Thirty percent of military personnel who kill themselves have never deployed and 60 percent have not seen combat say published reports, leading to the suspicion that the excessive administration of psychoactive drugs in the military is the culprit.

Yet, if you're looking for names of the Pharma companies who've created the most drugged up fighting force in history, you'll have to look at the conflicts of interest of the authors of the research, which appeared in JAMA Psychiatry in March. They report at least 15 financial links to Big Pharma including to Eli Lilly, GlaxoSmithKline, Ortho-McNeil Janssen Scientific Affairs, Pfizer, Sanofi-Aventis, Shire US and Johnson & Johnson. Reported links of some authors are conspicuously absent.

"Antidepressants increased the risk compared to placebo of suicidal thinking and behavior (suicidality) in children, adolescents, and young adults in short-term studies of major depressive disorder (MDD) and other psychiatric disorders. Anyone considering the use of PAXIL or any other antidepressant in a child, adolescent, or young adult must balance this risk with the clinical need."

That's the "black box" warning on the antidepressant Paxil, which the VA’s Iraq War Clinician Guide says is "clearly effective" for combat veterans suffering with PTSD, even though most are clearly "young adults." Paxil and other SSRI antidepressants, all of which carry suicide warnings, are recommended in the Guide as "first line medications for PTSD pharmacotherapy in men and women with military-related PTSD." Between 2001 and 2009, 73,103 prescriptions for Zoloft,  38,199 for Prozac, 17,830 for Paxil and 12,047 for Cymbalta were dispensed according to Tricare data.

Prescriptions for anticonvulsants like Topamax and Neurontin, which also carry suicide warnings, rose 56 percent in the same group, says Navy Times. And the use of antipsychotics like Zyprexa, Seroquel and Risperdal which also carry suicide warnings?  Seroquel leapt by 700 percent in active duty troops from 2001 through 2009 reported the New York Times. Maybe the suicides are caused by the green beans as Dorothy Parker would have said.

The authors of the long-awaited papers turned over every stone except the ones that feather their nests. They considered military personnel's gender, race/ethnicity, age, age at enlistment, mental history, deployment history, rank, marital status and even education. But nowhere do the words "medication," antidepressant" or "prescription" appear in the new research even though, "At least one in six service members is on some form of psychiatric drug," according to Military Times. An internal study of all deaths in Warrior Transition Units (WTUs) "found the biggest risk factor may be putting a soldier on numerous drugs simultaneously, a practice known as polypharmacy," wrote Marine Times in 2010.

There is money for Pharma in keeping troops and veterans drugged up. And there is money for doctors willing to live with conflicts of interest. One example is Matthew Friedman, MD, executive director of the VA’s National Center for PTSD who admits receiving an AstraZeneca honorarium in an online course, Pharmacological Treatment of PTSD and Comorbid Disorders which--surprise!--promotes psychoactive drugs. AstraZeneca makes Seroquel. Friedman has also served as a Pfizer Visiting Professor. Neither relationship was reported on his section of the military suicide research in JAMA Psychiatry.

Friedman is far from the only official working for the government while taking Pharma money. VA administrators unabashedly receive money from Pharma, and even enroll veterans in their Pharma-financed clinical trials, making no effort to hide the dual loyalties. One DOD official cited in Born with a Junk Food Deficiency, recommends off-label use of psychoactive drugs in published reports while attributing military suicides to the availability of firearms and "dear John" letters from the girl back home. Right. She also appears in a Pharma-funded video despite being a government official.

While academic, government and military researchers continue to play their game of funding Whac-A-Mole, pretending they don't know the source of many suicides while profiting from them, we may never know the true toll. "The number of military suicide victims who may have been taking antidepressants or anticonvulsants is unclear," says Army Times. "The Army repeatedly has denied a Military Times Freedom of Information Act request for that data."


Picture of

Antidepressant drugs as a class are exceedingly toxic and are of marginal benefit. What ever happened to counseling? Although it may be that philosophically difficult for these young men to rationalize what they are asked to do.

Picture of

This certainly explains why military and VA physicians feel they cannot allow their patients access to information about a funded (free for eight weeks) nutrient/enzyme protocol for veterans, military personnel and their partners with PTSD or anxiety disorders. Some with severe PTSD etc have found find their way to the program and have already responded powerfully to the Equilib Nutrient/enzyme Protocol. When they've gone to the VA for ongoing financial assistance as their funded period was ending, the VA flatly refused. Even when they're saving thousands of dollars a month, they won't provide $200.00/month or less to allow the soldiers they're supposed to be caring for to maintain their gains.

In one case I vividly remember, a veteran who was frequently hospitalized due to treatment resistant panic attacks, PTSD and depression responded dramatically. In the space of three months he'd gone from aggregate symptom scores in the eighties, to total aggregate scores of zero-three. He'd not been hospitalized for three months, was off five of his six psych meds and the last was reduced by fifty percent. He begged for help from the VA till he could find a job, so that he could afford to continue on the protocol after a decade on disability. Their ruling was that there was no mechanism that could allow him to receive $200.00/month to continue even though they'd saved tens of thousands of dollars in the previous three months.

Not caring for vets properly because you're too cheap to do so is shameful. Spending a fortune while refusing to fund an inexpensive program for individuals because it's not a pharmaceutical - when it has already proven to be far more successful at a fraction the cost - is social vandalism in my opinion.

Picture of

The number of military suicides is alarming. However implicating the drugs used to treat psychiatric disease is like saying that everyone who dies in a hospital was adversely affected by the presence if light bulbs. Additionally the military is a largely male population which itself is a population with a statistical increase in suicide completion compared to the general population. It would be nice to point a finger at the fact that drug companies fund researchers who are studying this issue as evidence of a conspiracy, but that's a fairly simplistic view of what is an increasingly complex problem. We are only now gaining any degree of understanding regarding PTSD and brain plasticity and the mechanisms associated.

Picture of

Ask a military person, why members kill themselves, as I did. The answer is quick and clear.
They have no choices. They can't quit the job and go home. They can't tell the truth, as they see it, about our warring. But they do have the choice to end their lives -- so they do.

Picture of

Ms Wicks you hit the nail on the head. I wish I could get every individual I know to read or watch recently declassified US military experiments. Thank you, juliette

Picture of

you compare a study of insulated kids and then mention that out troop are ---also young. you then try to act like one class of young is the same as the other. bogus premise, bogus conclusions. did I mention bogus post? At least you learned and applied the propogandists first rule: a little core of truth inside the lies. u got my email...

Leave A Comment


Medicare Advantage plans are surging in popularity. What’s at stake for seniors in your community as private companies increasingly administer Medicare? This webinar will help cover an essential story on a program that covers 60 million Americans across the country. Sign-up here!

In this season of giving, you can support journalism that saves lives by making a tax-deductible contribution to the Center for Health Journalism. For 15 years, the Center has made it possible for reporters to call attention to untold stories, highlight solutions and bring communities together around common aims. In today’s difficult news environment, the USC Annenberg Center for Health Journalism provides critical support so that reporters can produce ambitious, game-changing projects on health and well-being. You can text to donate. No amount is too small; just send a text to 41-444 and type the message CHJ for further instructions.

Got a great idea for a substantive reporting project?  Let us fund it! (And bring you to L.A. for five days of intensive training as well!)


Follow Us



CHJ Icon