Skip to main content.

Taking Water Samples: Lessons from the Field

Taking Water Samples: Lessons from the Field

Picture of Joy Horowitz

Fresno River, environmental health, water pollution, toxins, Joy Horowitz, reporting on health

It is, perhaps, not surprising that a reporter who authored a book called Parts Per Million would have a cursory understanding of how to collect data on environmental toxins. So it is with an equal measure of humility and embarrassment that my final blog for Reporting on Health reflects the utter stupidity I felt when I traveled to California's Central Valley to collect water samples -- and realized I had little idea of what I was actually getting myself into.

No doubt, taking water samples for a story about pesticide contamination is a risky proposition for any journalist.

For one thing, you have to know what you're looking for. Are the pesticides in question water soluble? Do they have half-lives that might elude testing? For another, there's the question of whether the laboratory you're using has the capacity to analyze your samples correctly.

But most important is the final result: if you don't detect pesticides in the water you've collected, will that undermine the premise of your story? Or, conversely, if your lab results come back with detections for multiple herbicides in the same sample of tap water, as happened to me, what are your ethical obligations to the people who have agreed to have their water tested?

Lucky for me, my editor at Sierra agreed that my story about the link between Parkinson's disease and pesticide use in California's Central Valley farming communities would be strengthened if we collected our own data.

My reporting, which looked at the people behind the statistics, was inspired by a series of elegant studies (see the International Journal of Epidemiology, American Journal of Epideiology and European Journal of Epidemiology) by UCLA epidemiologist Beate Ritz and a team of researchers, who found that Central Valley residents under age 60 who lived near fields where the pesticides maneb and paraquat had been sprayed between 1974 and 1999 had a Parkinson's rate five times higher than other residents in the region. The federally-funded research was the first of its kind to actually quantify chemical exposures, rather than rely on residents' recall, by comparing pesticide application records with land-use maps. Of particular concern to the UCLA scientists was the consumption of private well water in farming regions with documented long-term pesticide use. Domestic wells are not regulated by state or federal clean water laws.

Since their work was based on historical information, I was curious to find out whether I'd find evidence of domestic well water contamination now.

Clearly, there is no paucity of data documenting groundwater contamination in California. Federal studies by the U.S. Geological Survey (see an overview of water quality from domestic wells, 1991-2004, data on on ground-water quality in the San Joaquin Valley, and the Pesticide National Synthesis Project) and state tests by both the California Department of Pesticide Regulation (DPR) and State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) show a 30-year history of pesticide contamination in the Central Valley. But DPR, citing national security concerns, doesn't reveal the exact location of its tests. And the most recent groundwater assessments by SWRCB are based on data collected three years ago.

So, I set out with an ice cooler and amber glass bottles from a Los Angeles-based environmental monitoring laboratory. And I kept replenishing my supply of ice along the way. What I didn't realize, until after I had driven 200 miles to drop off my water samples to the lab, was that its detection limits were set too low. In other words, I needed a lab that could detect chemical substances at the parts per trillion level but the first lab I relied on used less sensitive assay methods in the parts per billion range – 1,000 times less than what was needed.

"Just because we didn't find it doesn't mean it's not there," the lab chemist explained to me of our initial findings of "non-detects" for pesticides. This, after sinking $1,200 of my own money – for nothing.

Not ready to give up, I explained my predicament to a scientist who works for a federal agency. He offered to cover all costs of analysis, sampling kits and pre-paid shipping labels if I agreed to collect three 1-liter glass bottles of water for each sample sent overnight via Federal Express to the laboratory in exchange for confidentiality. With my editor's approval, we agreed to the arrangement.

The question of whose water I would test and where was another challenge. Thanks to Maria Herrera, community outreach organizer with the Community Water Center in Visalia, I was able to gain access to domestic water wells in Orosi and other farming communities. Also invaluable were members of the Central Valley Parkinson's Disease Support Group in Visalia, who welcomed me and encouraged me to gather water tests. With their help, I was able to gain permission -- and access -- to collect samples. In one case, I agreed to not reveal the identity of a longtime resident.

It took about 90 days to receive the results, given the number of analytes and low levels of pesticides being tested.

This story took 18 months from start to finish, a record for me. One of my greatest frustrations was what did not appear in print. For example, I spent time with some remarkable people, including Teresa DeAnda an activist with Californians for Pesticide Reform, whose work was not included in my article. Space limitations also meant that the work of scientist Annie Esperanza at Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Park was edited out of my story. Her data collection from sediment, streams and snow helped me understand that, through air modeling, it's possible to track how organophosphate pesticides used in agriculture on the valley floor travel high up into the Sierras -- and how research from scientists in our national parks is advancing key public health issues. And Nicole M. Gatto, assistant research professor of epidemiology at UCLA School of Public Health and the lead investigator on "Well Water Consumption and Parkinson's Disease in Rural California" was especially helpful and I regret that her contributions to my story did not meet print.

My fellowship project remains ongoing. Next month, I'll return to Visalia to share our water testing results at the monthly meeting of the local Parkinson's disease support group – and to personally thank the families that made the story possible.

Photo credit: Eliza Peyton via Flickr

Comments

Picture of Rebecca Plevin

Joy - I cover similar issues here in the San Joaquín Valley, and have often been tempted to do my own testing. It seems like it was challenging, but certainly worthwhile for you. I know your story has made an impact here in the Valley!

Picture of Martha Shirk

It's so great to hear that you're taking the results back to the community. Congratulations on a terrific project!

Picture of Joy Horowitz

Thanks, Martha! Couldn't have done it without your support and encouragement.

Picture of Leah Beth Ward

Wow, what a long haul Joy. But well worth it. Congrats on the groundbreaking work.

Picture of

Thanks so much, Leah.

Picture of

It is all about water, water, water--a public trust resource.

Michael Ableman's photograph, "Your typical industrial field worker" would be searing addition to your Jan/Feb 2012 Sierra article, "Parkinson's Alley."

I believe you will find a copy of it in Yvon Chouinard's "Let My People Go Surfing: The Education Of A Reluctant Businessman."

Your spot-on observation about tobacco and cancer is right out of "The Cigarette Papers," UCSF library--Legacy Tobacco Documents Library (LTDL).

May I suggest a next Sierra article, a comparative: Yvon Chouinard and perhaps Jared Huffman, and the two Central Valley water privateers, Steward Resnick and Westland's Tom Birmingham.

You were concerned about the health hazards at Beverly Hills High. Well, we've got trouble right here in River City!

You should be doubly concerned about what they want to sell all of you. Look closely and you'll see the water they want to send your way will be post-industrial and of uncertain quality.

In that vain, Bruce Tokars's (btokars@salmonwaternow.org) video should be viewed by you, your husband, your children, your dog, and your neighbor's children--"The Water Pirates." (It can also found on You Tube.)

Three minutes in you will meet Dr. Gray Brechin, visiting scholar, UC Berkeley Department of Geography, and I quote: "It is like hooking your sewage system up with your drinking supply system."

Its 10 minutes of red meat, if you think our Northern California water is for drinking...

By the way, that was a great piece of investigative journalism. Greg Palast would applaud the effort, as do I!

Water, water everywhere and not a drop to drink!

Leave A Comment

Announcements

Join our webinar at 1 p.m. Wednesday, December 5 to find out more about the 2019 California Fellowship, which provides $1,000 reporting grants and six months of expert mentoring to 20 journalists, plus community engagement grants of up to $2,000, plus specialized mentoring, to five.  Click here  to register.

CONNECT WITH THE COMMUNITY

Follow Us

Facebook


Twitter

CHJ Icon
ReportingHealth