Skip to main content.

Critics: Study Linking Red Meat To Earlier Death Is Bad Science

Critics: Study Linking Red Meat To Earlier Death Is Bad Science

Picture of Barbara Feder Ostrov

red meat, nutrition, premature death, reporting on health

Drop that T-bone! Or should you?

A long-term study of more than 110,000 adults found that routinely eating even small quantities of red meat increased the risk of dying early, Eryn Brown reports for the Los Angeles Times. Researchers from the Harvard School of Public Health found that adding just three ounces of unprocessed red meat, like steak, to your daily diet can raise mortality rates by 13 percent. Processed meat, like hot dogs, is worse.

Brown writes:

Previous studies had associated red meat consumption with diabetes, heart disease and cancer, all of which can be fatal. Scientists aren't sure exactly what makes red meat so dangerous, but the suspects include the iron and saturated fat in beef, pork and lamb, the nitrates used to preserve them, and the chemicals created by high-temperature cooking.

Enter the critics: University of Massachussets epidemiology professor Marya Zilberberg unpacks the data and finds that the absolute risk of death from eating red meat daily is vanishingly small: "I am far more likely to die next time I get into my car than from eating burgers, even if I do indulge in one a couple of times per week," she writes. Zoë Harcombe offers a similar critique at her obesity blog. 

Related Posts:

At the next pharma love fest, spend some time with absolute risk

Danger! Writing about relative risks can lead your readers astray

Want more from Reporting on Health? Join us, sign up for our newsletter, like us on Facebook or follow us on Twitter. Check out our Tumblr, too!

Photo credit: Taryn via Flickr

Leave A Comment

Announcements

The engagement editor's mission: to advance the work of our California media partners, furthering public knowledge, storytelling, engagement and connection around community health and health policy issues in diverse communities. The ideal candidate will have both journalism and community engagement experience. Go to this link to apply.

We're looking for journalists who think big and want to gain new insights into the effects on vulnerable children  and their families of poverty, trauma and toxic stress. The all-expenses-paid 2017 National Fellowship, which provides five days of intensive workshops, field trips and discussions, along with $2,000-$12,000 grants for reporting and community engagement and six months of mentoring. Click here for details. Deadline: March 24.

CONNECT WITH THE COMMUNITY

Member Activities

Halona Black joined the community

Connect with Halona Black

Anna K has shared a blog post

Read it.

Michael Altus's profile has been updated

Connect with Michael Altus

Denisse Salazar has shared a blog post

Read it.

Jamie Hopkins has shared a fellowship project

Read it.
More Member Activities

Follow Us

Facebook


Twitter

CHJ Icon
ReportingHealth