Skip to main content.

Critics: Study Linking Red Meat To Earlier Death Is Bad Science

Critics: Study Linking Red Meat To Earlier Death Is Bad Science

Picture of Barbara Feder Ostrov

red meat, nutrition, premature death, reporting on health

Drop that T-bone! Or should you?

A long-term study of more than 110,000 adults found that routinely eating even small quantities of red meat increased the risk of dying early, Eryn Brown reports for the Los Angeles Times. Researchers from the Harvard School of Public Health found that adding just three ounces of unprocessed red meat, like steak, to your daily diet can raise mortality rates by 13 percent. Processed meat, like hot dogs, is worse.

Brown writes:

Previous studies had associated red meat consumption with diabetes, heart disease and cancer, all of which can be fatal. Scientists aren't sure exactly what makes red meat so dangerous, but the suspects include the iron and saturated fat in beef, pork and lamb, the nitrates used to preserve them, and the chemicals created by high-temperature cooking.

Enter the critics: University of Massachussets epidemiology professor Marya Zilberberg unpacks the data and finds that the absolute risk of death from eating red meat daily is vanishingly small: "I am far more likely to die next time I get into my car than from eating burgers, even if I do indulge in one a couple of times per week," she writes. Zoë Harcombe offers a similar critique at her obesity blog. 

Related Posts:

At the next pharma love fest, spend some time with absolute risk

Danger! Writing about relative risks can lead your readers astray

Want more from Reporting on Health? Join us, sign up for our newsletter, like us on Facebook or follow us on Twitter. Check out our Tumblr, too!

Photo credit: Taryn via Flickr

Leave A Comment


Soaring out-of-pocket costs, rising premiums, and shaky insurance exchanges raise urgent questions this election season. What policies might address these problems, and how do the presidential candidates’ health plans differ? This webinar will give an overview of each candidates’ policy prescriptions and provide reporters with crucial context for covering one of the election’s most important but overlooked issues.

The 2017 California Fellowship, for California-based journalists only, will be held March 5-9, 2017 in Los Angeles. This Fellowship will focus on vulnerable populations and access to care and health care reform and innovation. We also take an in-depth look at how community conditions influence individuals' prospects for health. Each Fellow receives a $1,000 stipend to assist with the costs of reporting an ambitious Fellowship project on a California health issue, as well as six months of mentoring by a Senior Fellow. Deadline to apply is Dec. 1.  For more information, go here.


Member Activities

Bill Gordon has shared a blog post

Read it.

Elizabeth Zach has shared a essay

Read it.

Samantha Caiola has shared a blog post

Read it.

Chinyere Amobi has shared a blog post

Read it.

Alex Hepgurn has added an award to their profile

More Member Activities

Follow Us



CHJ Icon