Skip to main content.

Medical Board of California, go public with your pain

Medical Board of California, go public with your pain

Picture of William Heisel

william heisel, medical board, reporting on health

The Medical Board of California, which meets this weekend in Los Angeles, is under pressure again to reform itself. This seems to be a nearly annual occurrence.

The latest occasion has been prompted by a series of articles and commentaries in the Los Angeles Times, mainly by Michael Hiltzik and Stuart Pfeifer, about sloppy plastic surgery centers being allowed to stay open despite a pattern of patient deaths and injuries. (I would like to claim some small credit, too. After my series "The Shadow Practice," ran last year and documented the unfortunate death of Maria Garcia during a plastic surgery, the Times wrote its own story three months later about Maria Garcia. While the Medical Board may not read Antidote regularly, its members most certainly read the Times.)

Hiltzik this week began a prescription for "Curing the state's medical regulation system." He wrote:

The existing staff does a heroic job under tough conditions, but the board doesn't have enough medical experts on call for timely review of patient complaints. It has difficulty retaining investigators because they're paid less than those working for the attorney general - so after the board trains them and gives them a bit of experience, they often quit for greener pastures. During the Schwarzenegger administration, the board appealed to the governor for exemptions from his hiring freezes and other cutbacks. It was turned down.

Hiltzik thinks the board should make a public case for more resources, and I could not agree more. The board is forever begging state legislators to allow it to charge doctors more for the privilege of being licensed. This should not be so difficult. Considering the average salary of a physician, the fee for a license in California is a bargain: $404 per year. Does that sound like a hardship?

The California Medical Association, the doctors' main lobbying group in the state, understandably, has fought to keep fees low for its members, but the CMA's Dr. James T. Hay said something to Hiltzik I thought was fairly tone deaf given the body count stacking up under the medical board's watch:

We think they have enough resources. Certainly they built up a substantial surplus, otherwise the governors couldn't have raided it.

Let's see if we can sort this out. The board, comprised mostly of doctors and funded entirely by doctor's fees, took the smart step of holding some money in reserves in case, oh, I don't know, the state verged on the edge of bankruptcy or something.

That worst case scenario did happen and, so, both Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger and now Gov. Jerry Brown have, indeed, raided that surplus. In response, the CMA, also a doctor-dominated organization funded by doctors, is now dinging the medical board for diligent financial planning? And saying, basically, that it got what it deserved and should suffer as a result? This certainly seems at odds with the CMA's stated mission: "Promoting the science and art of medicine, the care and well-being of patients, the protection of the public health and the betterment of the medical profession."

How much does it cost for a Los Angeles doctor to become a member of the CMA? $1,100 annually. I'll do the math for you. That's 63% more than it the state charges for a license.

The board should point this discrepancy out in a public campaign. It costs doctors more to protect the few bad doctors in their midst from punishment than it does to help maintain the state's system of medical rules and guidelines. The board should flat-out call out the CMA for hampering the board's ability to protect patients. The board's members should make a cogent public case for a better-funded, more nimble and more accountable board. All the board has only to look at my Shadow Practice map or at some of Hiltzik's stories and Pfeifer's stories for examples of where it has failed.

As Hiltzik notes in his piece, if the medical board were comprised of more patient advocates and fewer doctors, it would truly be independent and able to adequately assess complaints of negligence and harm. The board would still be able to tap medical experts to analyze the evidence, as it does now, and it still would have to jump through the same hoops required by the state Attorney General's office in order to file charges against a physician. The system of checks and balances would actually work instead of all the checks being in the physicians' accounts.

"Who would be hurt by such a change?" Hiltzik writes. "Not good doctors, whose reputations are marred by the work of unfit colleagues. And not the patients."

Have a comment or complaint? Write me at askantidote@gmail.com or share your views in the comments below. Follow me on Twitter @wheisel.

Coming Monday: Part 2 of my interview with journalist Jonathan Starkey.

Comments

Picture of

All of the money that comes to the Medical Board comes from physician l;icensing fees, not the taxpayer.

Nevermind, Gov Schwarzenegger took $6 million to help pay state debts and Gov Brown wants to take an additional $9 million.

The politically appointed Med Board  has been headed by a non-physician, Barbara Yaroslvsky, and the program has been suffering worse than ever.

The entire discipline/enforcement process needs a complete overhaul---and the investigation team needs to increase in size and salary.

 

Jeannette

Picture of K Patrick McDonald

Jeannette -

I agree with most everything you so accurately point out. Except . . .

Your implication that a competent & effective Board must be headed by a physician.

To which I say, absolutely not.

In my view, one of the single biggest flaws in our disciplinary sstructure, is the belief that only physicians ought be at the top of these very important oversight groups.

The entire matrix needs to be turned upsidedown. And that starts - to my way of thinking - by competent, logical and ethical NON-physicians directing these organizations.

Physicians have had 150 years to get it right. It's time to take a whole new tack.

 

 

Picture of Faith Sanchez

I recently filed a complaint to the Medical Board of California against my plastic surgeon after discovering that the before/after pictures they had led me to believe were my doctors work turned out to belong to another doctor. Of course, I ended up with undesirable results, can no longer breathe through my nose, and have a big dent on the side of my nose. I am now in need of a $15K+ revision. This was 1 of 4 botched surgeries that he performed on me. I had devastating results with the other surgeries as well and was given false information about all of them and never told of any risks. I have proof, not just my word. I wasn’t even given consent forms to sign for all surgeries. A pattern of deception, not just a onetime incident. I gave the Board all the proof they needed, as I had all emails, photos, etc. I sent the Board the touched up ‘after’ photos (by doctor or staff) of me to make his work appear good. (zoom in and can see where they are touched up). I was surprised when the board found no wrong doing by him or his staff because this is “elective surgery.” Somebody clearly is not doing their job.

Leave A Comment

Announcements

Medicare Advantage plans are surging in popularity. What’s at stake for seniors in your community as private companies increasingly administer Medicare? This webinar will help cover an essential story on a program that covers 60 million Americans across the country. Sign-up here!

In this season of giving, you can support journalism that saves lives by making a tax-deductible contribution to the Center for Health Journalism. For 15 years, the Center has made it possible for reporters to call attention to untold stories, highlight solutions and bring communities together around common aims. In today’s difficult news environment, the USC Annenberg Center for Health Journalism provides critical support so that reporters can produce ambitious, game-changing projects on health and well-being. You can text to donate. No amount is too small; just send a text to 41-444 and type the message CHJ for further instructions.

Got a great idea for a substantive reporting project?  Let us fund it! (And bring you to L.A. for five days of intensive training as well!)

CONNECT WITH THE COMMUNITY

Follow Us

Facebook


Twitter

CHJ Icon
ReportingHealth