Skip to main content.

The Shadow Practice, Part 7: Punishment for drug-dealing doctors more severe in Arizona

The Shadow Practice, Part 7: Punishment for drug-dealing doctors more severe in Arizona

Picture of William Heisel

One doctor allowed her clinics in Santa Ana, California, to be used as front operations for selling highly addictive painkillers.

Another doctor agreed to be paid $2,000 a month for the use of his registration with the DEA so that the front operations could keep up their supply.

Another doctor was willing to rent his registration for half that.

All of them were caught red-handed by the U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency. Medical Board of California investigations are not made public, but, so far, none of them have been disciplined in California.

Antidote wondered whether other states took seriously the diversion of painkillers away from legitimate patients to people who don't even have to see a doctor to get their drugs. The first state we checked was Arizona, and the very first doctor turned out to be a perfect example.

The Arizona Medical Board stripped Dr. Thomas E. Cosmas of his license in February 2010. He had prescribed hydrocodone too frequently and without performing adequate evaluations to justify the prescriptions. He didn't keep enough records to support the prescriptions. The medical board wrote:

The standard of care to prescribing long-term opioid medications for chronic malignant pain requires a physician to conduct an appropriate evaluation of pain problem and to counsel the patient regarding the risks of the medications .A physician is required to maintain adequate legible medical records containing, at a minimum, sufficient information to identify the patient, support the diagnosis, justify the treatment, accurately document the results, indicate advice and cautionary warnings provided to the patient and provide sufficient information for another practitioner to assume continuity of the patient's care at any point in the course of treatment.

The board found that Cosmas had deviated from these standards and did not deserve the right to practice medicine. It took his license away, posted his disciplinary history, albeit quite abbreviated, on its Web site and reported him to the National Practitioner Data Bank.

It did all of this based on one patient who took drugs prescribed by Cosmas for six years. The patient, 37, ended up being hospitalized for "acute psychosis related to excessive hydrocodone."

The doctors described in last week's installment of The Shadow Practice – Dr. Joy Johnson, Dr. Scott Bickman and Dr. Thomas Mitchell – played a role in a scheme in California to use their medical licenses to help an unlicensed clinic operator distribute more than 1 million doses of hydrocodone to countless people. The doctors never saw the patients, never evaluated them, never counseled them of the risks of taking the drugs or made sure they were truly in need of the drugs for medical reasons in the first place.

Yet when a patient checks their profiles on the Medical Board of California's Web site, that patient will see nothing about the drug scheme and nothing about the DEA investigation that led to its ringleader losing his ability to prescribe painkillers and other narcotics.

Arizona clearly has its own problems with disciplining doctors. (See the case of Dr. Gary W. Hall, the ophthalmologist who seemed to be begging the medical board to take his license away.) But, when it comes to prescription drug problems, they have cracked down repeatedly in the past year.

Dr. Albert Szu Yun Yeh  was busted by the DEA for "assisting a criminal syndicate, money laundering and administering narcotic drugs" at his Mohave County clinic. Within days of his federal indictment in July 2009, the Medical Board of Arizona restricted his license. By October, the board had taken it away.

A DEA investigation also prompted the Medical Board of Arizona to take a hard look at Dr. Frederick T. Strand. The agency had prohibited Strand from prescribing addictive narcotics in December 2009. The board looked ad 12 patients' records and, because of gaps, errors and a history of overprescribing, took Strand's license away in February 2010.

In June 2009, the board banned Dr. Gerald J. Taitague from prescribing controlled substances. And, to keep him honest, the board did something that few boards do. It checked with its sister agency, the  Arizona Pharmacy Board, to see whether Taitague was following the rules. He was not. He was, in fact, prescribing Oxycontin to one patient repeatedly. By February 2010, the board had stripped Taitague of his license.

One patient, a dozen patients, it doesn't seem to matter. If you get caught dispensing prescription drugs like candy in Arizona, you will lose your license.

The same cannot be said for California.

Related posts:

The Shadow Practice Part 1: Disciplined doctor found an exile community in immigrant health care

The Shadow Practice Part 2: New owners can't exorcise ghosts of clinic's past

The Shadow Practice Part 3: Immigrant clinic had deep roots in deception

The Shadow Practice Part 4: Doc begs patients for loans

The Shadow Practice Part 5: Drug pushers running this clinic were far from saints

The Shadow Practice Part 6: Doctors sell their souls, and their licenses, on the cheap

The Shadow Practice Part 8: How one California clinic became a magnet for bad medicine

The Shadow Practice, Part 9: Woman dies during cosmetic surgeries at unlicensed clinic

The Shadow Practice, Part 10: Coroner rules mistakes that killed patient a "therapeutic misadventure"

California governor and medical board should stand accused in patient's death

Doctors Behaving Badly: Ophthalmologist should have kept closer eye on patients

Two reporters catch the same doctor in a very similar act

Comments

Picture of

Regardless of the allegations towards dr. T- i have come to realize that it is hard to find a doctor who is not judgemental and only in it for how much they can bill your insurance.. To find a doctor that is truely in it and compassionate is hard to come by and dr. T was just that... In it- so to speak- for his patients,. I was always put first.. And i always knew he cared.. His payment was not his first priority.. It was my well being and care... I went through dome of the hardest points of my adult life.. And if not for him and his care and concern i would not have been so open with my doctor and able to get the treatment i truely needed. He may have abused his power from what i hear but its hard to believe there is a better doctor in this world.. Sorry to those who would disagree.. But u prob dont know him if u dont know that what i say is 150% true..

Leave A Comment

Announcements

The Democratic primaries are fast approaching — now is the time to brush up on the leading candidates’ latest plans for health care and their key differences. Our next webinar will leave you ready to dive into one of the election's most vital issues. Sign up here!

Get the latest updates from top experts and a leading journalist tracking the story, as well as crucial context and insights for reporting responsibly on this fast-moving public health threat in our next webinar on Feb. 28 at 10 a.m. PT / 1 p.m. ET. Sign-up here!

Got a great idea for a reporting project on vulnerable families or health disparities?  We'll help fund it, and provide you with five days of all-expenses-paid training at USC in July, plus six months of mentoring. Click here for more information.

CONNECT WITH THE COMMUNITY

Follow Us

Facebook


Twitter

CHJ Icon
ReportingHealth